It feels like the rational response to being short of history: if the odds on any one lender are poor, try more of them. The mechanism works the other way. Each application generates that lender’s own credit enquiry against your file, the enquiry stays there whether or not anything was approved, and a cluster of them inside a short window is read by later lenders as a signal about your circumstances — commonly before anyone has looked at the business at all. An established company has years of record to set against that signal. A company under a year old has almost nothing, so the signal is a larger share of what the next lender sees.
The sequence is worth naming. Six applications go out in a fortnight; the declines arrive for the reason that was true before any of them were sent, which is the trading record; the file now carries six enquiries as well as a thin record; and the facility that might genuinely have been available at month fourteen is assessed against a file that looks like someone turned down six times. The mechanics of this are set out here.
One smaller one belongs in the same breath: do not take an expensive short facility in month eight to prove the company can service debt. The obligation shows up in the assessment at month eighteen and reduces what a bank can responsibly add on top, which is the opposite of the intended effect.
If an application has already been declined, that is a different task — the decline itself is diagnostic, and the next step is narrowing rather than repeating. What to do after a rejection.